Agro Chemicals

Oil Dispersion Formulation Agrochemical: OD and EW Guide

oil dispersion formulation agrochemical — oil-based dispersion separating and remixing in a clear glass cylinder | Global Formulation
An oil dispersion that has settled and is being remixed shows why recovery on shaking is a core stability test for OD products.

Some actives degrade in water, and others are solids that dissolve in no practical solvent. Two routes follow: suspend the solid in oil as an oil dispersion, or dissolve the active in a solvent and emulsify it in water as an EW. Each route solves one problem and creates another, from sediment cakes and crystal growth to creaming and droplet ripening. This guide explains oil dispersion formulation agrochemical design for OD and EW products, from carrier oils and dispersants to rheology, stability clauses and failure modes. It draws on the FAO/WHO specifications manual, the CropLife technical monograph and open peer-reviewed studies, plus the formulation support Global Formulation gives agrochemical manufacturers.

Oil Dispersion Formulation Agrochemical Basics: What OD and EW Are

OD and EW look like neighbouring products, yet they sit on opposite sides of the oil-water divide. An oil dispersion carries solid active particles in an oil, while an emulsion in water carries oil droplets in an aqueous phase. That single difference decides which actives fit, how the product behaves on dilution and which failures to expect. The specifications manual and the CropLife monograph define both precisely.

The FAO/WHO specifications manual defines an oil dispersion as a stable suspension of active ingredients in an organic fluid, intended for dilution with water before use. It defines an emulsion, oil in water, as a stable emulsion of active ingredients in an aqueous phase. In an EW the active is normally a liquid forming the dispersed oil phase, or a solid or liquid dissolved in a water-immiscible solvent. The EW guideline applies to aqueous macro-emulsions only, not to suspo-emulsions, water-in-oil emulsions or micro-emulsions.

Type What It Is Active in the Pack Behaviour on Dilution
OD, oil dispersionSuspension of fine particles in a non-aqueous fluidSolid, suspended in oilDoes not disperse as spontaneously as an EC, so the spray tank needs stirring
EW, emulsion oil in waterAqueous macro-emulsion of oil globulesLiquid, or dissolved in a water-immiscible solventDilutes into water as an emulsion; checked by emulsion stability and re-emulsification
SC, suspension concentrateSuspension with water as the fluidSolid, suspended in waterDilutes as a suspension; see our SC formulation guide
EC, emulsifiable concentrateHomogeneous solution of the active in solvent plus emulsifiersDissolvedEmulsifies spontaneously on dilution; see our EC formulation guide
Key Insight Both OD and EW are metastable. The FAO/WHO manual says oil dispersions usually develop a concentration gradient on standing. It asks analysts to homogenise the container and probe the bottom for a sticky, non-dispersed layer called a cake. Stability for these products means full recovery on shaking, so a specification has to test recovery, not only appearance.

With the definitions fixed, the next question is how an oil dispersion is built.

Designing an Oil Dispersion: Carrier Oil, Dispersant, Rheology Modifier and Emulsifier

An oil dispersion has five jobs to do: carry the particles, keep them apart, stop them settling, emulsify on dilution and stay homogeneous through storage. Each job maps to a class of ingredient, and the classes interact. A supplier technical page states that choosing the right oil and surfactant system, including a non-aqueous dispersant, is the key to a good result. A formulator therefore designs the oil, the dispersant and the thickener as one system.

Component Role Examples Reported
Carrier oilContinuous phase that carries the solidParaffinic or aromatic solvents, vegetable oils and methylated seed oils; methyl oleate; rapeseed methyl esters
Non-aqueous dispersantWets the particles and keeps them apart in oilEthylene oxide and propylene oxide copolymer in one supplier example
Rheology modifierBuilds structure in the oil so particles do not sedimentOrganic bentonite; hydrophobic fumed silica
EmulsifierLets the concentrate emulsify when poured into waterCalcium dodecylbenzene sulfonate with non-ionic ethoxylates; anionic and non-ionic blends
Wetting agentLow-foaming wetting during milling and dilutionLow-foaming wetting agent in one supplier example
Aqueous dispersant, optionalImproves suspension stability in the spray tank after dilutionPolymeric aqueous dispersants

The process follows the same logic as a suspension concentrate. One supplier formulation guide mixes the dispersant into the oil, adds the active, disperses it under high shear and wet-grinds the premix until finely dispersed. The remaining ingredients go in afterwards. An open-access study of a botanical oil dispersion milled its premix in a bead mill with zirconium beads until the median particle size was 5 micrometres or less. Our guide to wet milling for suspension concentrates covers the milling principles that carry over.

oil dispersion formulation agrochemical process diagram — white emulsion droplets forming as concentrate meets water in a beaker | Global Formulation
A concentrate poured into water forms a milky emulsion cloud, the dilution step that the FAO/WHO emulsion and dispersion tests check.

Oil dispersions have clear advantages and clear limits. A supplier page reports that they suit hydrolytically unstable actives such as sulfonylureas. The oil phase acts as a built-in adjuvant, and no preservative is needed because the product contains no water. It also lists more sedimentation than water-based systems and difficult formulation as limitations. The botanical study's authors conclude, against a soluble concentrate reported in earlier work, that the oil dispersion improved spray uniformity and leaf coverage.

Rule of Thumb More emulsifier is not more stability. In the open-access study, too little emulsifier gave a turbid, unstable product, but the multiple light scattering stability index rose again as the dosage climbed above the minimum. Too little thickener gave a precipitate that did not redisperse. Look for the working window for each, not a ramp.

An emulsion in water is a different balancing act, because the dispersed phase is liquid.

Emulsion in Water (EW) Design: Solvent, Emulsifier Pair and Droplet Stability

An EW packs the oil phase as droplets in water, so the formulator controls droplet size, the interfacial film and the solvent together. The active is dissolved in a water-immiscible solvent, and an emulsifier system holds the droplets apart. Because the pack already contains an emulsion, stability must last through storage, not only through dilution. The design choices are the solvent, the emulsifier balance and the continuous phase additives.

The supplier guide shows the structure with a fungicide example. It combines an emulsifier made of anionic and non-ionic surfactants, a water-immiscible solvent for the active, propylene glycol as an antifreeze and water as the aqueous phase. The order of addition is simple: mix emulsifier and solvent, then add the active, the glycol and the water and homogenise. An open-access review of pesticide emulsions reports that surfactants with a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance of about 10 to 16 give good oil-in-water agricultural formulations.

Instability Route What Happens Design Response
CreamingDroplets separate as a concentrated layer; the template checks re-emulsificationSmaller droplets and a stable interfacial film
CoalescenceDroplets merge and free oil appearsStrong interfacial film from the emulsifier pair at the right balance
Ostwald ripeningOil moves from small droplets to large ones through the water phaseSolvent with very low water solubility
Cold-storage separationSolid or liquid separates after storage at 0 °CAntifreeze additive; low-temperature storage test

The review defines Ostwald ripening as the net transport of oil from smaller droplets to larger ones through the continuous phase. It adds that an oil that is insoluble in the continuous phase gives a kinetic barrier to ripening. Solvent choice is therefore a stability decision as well as a solubility decision. Our guides to emulsion science and to creaming, sedimentation and coalescence explain these mechanisms in depth.

Key Insight An EW is judged twice, once in the pack and once in the spray tank. A product can stay stable on the shelf and still cream or leave free oil after dilution in hard water. The FAO/WHO emulsion test therefore dilutes the product in two CIPAC standard waters and records cream and free oil over time.

Whichever type you choose, the specification clauses decide whether the product passes.

Stability Testing for OD and EW: Dispersion, Emulsion and Storage Clauses

The FAO/WHO manual gives a template specification for each type, and the templates share a skeleton. They cover pourability, behaviour on dilution, foam and two storage tests. They differ in what happens after dilution: an oil dispersion is checked for cream, free oil and sediment, while an emulsion is checked for cream and free oil. Knowing the clauses early lets a formulator design to the test, not discover it at registration.

Clause OD EW
PourabilityMT 148.1, maximum residueMT 148.1, maximum residue
Behaviour on dilutionDispersion stability, MT 180: cream, free oil and sediment after 0.5 h and again after re-dispersionEmulsion stability and re-emulsification, MT 36.3: cream and free oil at set times
Oversize particlesWet sieve, MT 185, to detect coarse particles, crystals or agglomerates that block nozzlesNot in the template
Persistent foamMT 47.3MT 47.3
Water contentMT 30.6, if requiredNot applicable
Storage at 0 °CMT 39.3, then dispersion stability and wet sieve must still passMT 39.3, volume of separated solid or liquid limited
Storage at 54 °C for 14 daysMT 46.4: active content retention, then pourability, dispersion stability and wet sieveMT 46.4: active content retention, then emulsion stability

The manual explains the logic for oil dispersions. Pourability confirms the product leaves its container, dispersion stability, wet sieve and foam confirm sprayability, and storage at elevated temperature confirms the absence of crystal growth. The manual also says laser diffraction particle size is not an ideal criterion for liquid formulations. Wet sieve plus suspensibility or dispersion stability should be used instead. The 0 °C test is not normally an essential clause for an oil dispersion.

Development studies add measurements beyond the template. The botanical oil dispersion study followed stability by multiple light scattering and measured suspensibility after hot storage. It judged wetting by static surface tension and dynamic contact angle, and spray deposition by droplet density and leaf coverage. Those tests tie the bench formulation to field behaviour, but they supplement the specification clauses rather than replace them.

Rule of Thumb Test the whole sequence, not single points. A passing initial dispersion test means little if the product fails the same test after the 54 °C storage. Run each clause before and after storage, in both standard waters, from the first lab batch onward.

The tests exist because particular failures keep recurring.

OD and EW Failure Modes: Sedimentation, Crystal Growth, Free Oil and Foam

Most failures of these two systems trace back to the physical state of the dispersed phase. Solid particles in oil settle, grow or clump, while liquid droplets in water cream, merge or ripen. Each failure has a signature the test clauses are designed to catch. Reading the signature points to the fix.

Failure System Signature Likely Fix
Sedimentation and cakeODClear oil on top, sticky non-dispersed layer on the bottomRheology structure, finer milling, dispersant review
Crystal growthODOversize crystals retained on the wet sieve after hot storageCheck active solubility in the oil; adjust oil or dispersant
Poor dispersion in the tankODCream, free oil or sediment in the dilution testRebalance the emulsifier; consider an aqueous dispersant
Water ingressODWater above the specified limit; degradation of a water-sensitive activeDry raw materials; control the packing line
Creaming and free oilEWCream layer or oil film on dilution or in storageEmulsifier balance; droplet size; solvent water solubility
Cold-storage separationEWSeparation after 0 °C storageAntifreeze; low-temperature trials
oil dispersion formulation agrochemical comparison infographic — paired cylinders showing a stable and a separated oil dispersion | Global Formulation
A stable and a separated oil dispersion side by side show the sedimentation and clear oil layer that the specification tests are designed to catch.

Crystal growth deserves special attention in oil dispersions. The manual states that elevated-temperature storage exists to ensure the absence of crystal growth upon storage, and the wet sieve then detects the crystals that formed. Solubility of the active in the carrier oil is therefore a measurement to make early, not an assumption. Our agrochemical technology and formulations guide places OD and EW among the other formulation types.

Key Insight Sedimentation is a design variable, not a defect to eliminate. The goal is a structure that holds particles through storage and recovers on shaking. A structure that is too strong will not pour, which is why pourability sits beside dispersion stability in the specification.

Knowing the failure modes makes the choice between formulation types more concrete.

Choosing Between OD, EW, SC and EC: Active Chemistry and Regulatory Fit

Formulation type follows the active, not the other way round. The active's state, its sensitivity to water and its solubility in practical solvents narrow the choice quickly. Commercial factors then decide among the remaining options, including solvent regulation, packaging and the registration route. A short decision framework prevents a long development detour.

  1. Liquid active or one that dissolves well in a safe solvent — EC or EW; the EW holds the solution as droplets in water.
  2. Solid, stable in water — SC or a water-dispersible granule, with water as the fluid.
  3. Solid, hydrolytically unstable — OD, because the oil phase excludes water and needs no preservative.
  4. Solid that must be loaded with other oil-soluble actives — OD, since the definition allows other dissolved actives in the oil.
  5. Active that needs better leaf contact — OD, where the oil phase acts as a built-in adjuvant according to supplier literature.
  6. Solvent load is a concern — EW rather than EC, because water carries part of the volume.

Registration then follows the formulation. In India, the CIB&RC publishes a list of pesticide formulations registered under the Insecticides Act, 1968. That list is the first place to check whether a given active and formulation type is already registered. Specification templates from FAO and WHO then give the physical clauses buyers expect. Dose rates, loadings and use claims are outside this guide by design, because registration and field data set them for each product.

The botanical oil dispersion study also reminds formulators that the application method matters. That study designed its product for unmanned aerial spraying and screened wetting and deposition accordingly. A consultant brings these constraints into the brief at the start.

Rule of Thumb Settle the hydrolysis and solubility questions before any surfactant screening. A formulation type chosen on convenience can fail for a reason no surfactant fixes. Examples are an active that degrades in the water phase or one that crystallises in the oil.

Turning that choice into a robust product is the work of a formulation partner.

Working With an Agrochemical Formulation Consultant

OD and EW development combines colloid science, solvent and oil selection, milling or emulsification engineering and regulatory knowledge. An agrochemical formulation consultant measures the active's solubility and water stability, screens oils and surfactant systems, and designs the test plan around the FAO/WHO clauses. Agrochemical product development services extend that into pilot batches, stability data packages and technical documents for registration. A contract formulation agrochemical manufacturer then runs the validated process at scale.

  1. Characterise the active — physical form, solubility in oils and solvents, and stability in water.
  2. Pick the formulation type — OD, EW, SC or EC, using the decision framework above.
  3. Screen the carrier and surfactants — oil, dispersant, emulsifier and rheology modifier as one system.
  4. Mill or emulsify — set the particle size or droplet size target and the equipment.
  5. Run the specification tests — dispersion or emulsion stability, wet sieve, foam and both storage tests.
  6. Pilot and scale — confirm repeatability across batches.
  7. Transfer to manufacture — write the process, quality limits and release tests for the contract partner.

Our agro chemicals range shows where formulation expertise supports crop protection products. Global Formulation provides formulation screening, stability programme design, specification support and contract manufacturing transfer for agrochemical manufacturers. Active loadings and surfactant ratios stay outside this guide by design, because they belong to each client's product.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an oil dispersion (OD) formulation in agrochemicals?

An oil dispersion is a stable suspension of solid active ingredients in a water-immiscible fluid, intended for dilution with water before use, according to the FAO/WHO specifications manual. The oil may also carry other dissolved actives.

It suits actives that degrade in water, because the oil phase excludes water. Supplier literature also credits the oil with acting as a built-in adjuvant.

Oil dispersions are metastable, so they need re-homogenising after storage and a spray tank that is stirred.

What is an emulsion in water (EW) formulation?

An EW is a stable emulsion of active ingredients in an aqueous phase, intended for dilution with water before use. The active is normally a liquid forming the dispersed oil phase, or a solid or liquid dissolved in a water-immiscible solvent.

The FAO/WHO guideline covers aqueous macro-emulsions only, not suspo-emulsions, water-in-oil emulsions or micro-emulsions.

Because the pack is already an emulsion, it must stay stable in storage and also after dilution in standard waters.

How do OD and SC formulations differ?

Both suspend a solid active, but an SC uses water as the fluid while an OD uses a water-immiscible oil. That choice decides which actives fit, because water-sensitive actives degrade in an SC but survive in an OD.

An OD also relies on oil-compatible dispersants, rheology modifiers and an emulsifier so that it disperses when diluted. An SC relies on aqueous dispersants and wetting agents.

Both are milled to a fine particle size, and both are metastable systems that need a structure to stop settling.

What tests does an oil dispersion need to pass?

The FAO/WHO template includes pourability (MT 148.1) and dispersion stability (MT 180) with cream, free oil and sediment limits. It adds wet sieve (MT 185), persistent foam (MT 47.3) and, if required, water content (MT 30.6).

Storage tests follow: 0 degrees C for 7 days (MT 39.3) and 54 degrees C for 14 days (MT 46.4). After storage, active content, pourability, dispersion stability and wet sieve must still comply.

The manual says laser diffraction particle size is not an ideal criterion for liquid formulations, so wet sieve and dispersion stability carry that role.

Why do oil dispersions develop crystals or sediment?

Sediment forms because solid particles are denser than the oil, and a clear liquid layer on top with a sticky cake at the bottom is the usual signature. Rheology structure, finer milling and a suitable dispersant control it.

Crystal growth occurs when the active dissolves slightly in the oil and re-crystallises on storage. The FAO/WHO manual includes elevated-temperature storage specifically to ensure the absence of crystal growth, and the wet sieve then detects oversize crystals.

Measuring the active's solubility in the carrier oil early prevents surprises.

How is an EW different from an EC?

An EC is a homogeneous solution of the active in solvent with emulsifiers that forms an emulsion spontaneously on dilution. An EW is already an emulsion of that solution in water before dilution.

Water therefore carries part of the volume, which lowers the solvent load per litre compared with an EC. The trade-off is that an EW must stay stable as an emulsion in storage, which brings creaming, coalescence and Ostwald ripening into play.

An open-access review notes that an oil insoluble in the continuous phase gives a kinetic barrier to ripening, so the solvent choice matters.

Does an oil dispersion or EW need registration, and where is it checked?

Yes. Agrochemical products are registered as specific formulations. In India, the CIB&RC publishes a list of pesticide formulations registered under the Insecticides Act, 1968, which is the first place to check an active and formulation type.

The FAO/WHO specification templates then supply the physical clauses buyers and regulators expect, such as dispersion stability and storage tests.

Registration pathways differ by country, so formulators confirm the route and data requirements before committing to a development plan.

Developing an OD or EW Formulation?

Global Formulation supports carrier and surfactant screening, stability programme design, specification writing and contract manufacturing transfer for agrochemical makers.

Talk to Our Formulation Team
AK

Absar Khan

Founder & Lead Consultant, Global Formulation

Absar Khan is a formulation consultant with experience across agrochemical formulations, emulsion and suspension systems, and lab-to-plant scale-up for chemical manufacturers and startups. He founded Global Formulation to provide accessible, expert-led formulation and product development services to manufacturers and entrepreneurs in the chemical and pharmaceutical industries. Connect with him on LinkedIn.

Message on WhatsApp