Jacketed stainless steel batch reactor with a relief line and catch tank in a reactor bay

Measure. Review. Design out.

Process safety and
thermal hazard assessment.

Hazards are designed out, not managed around.

We assess the thermal and process hazards of chemical reactions and plants: calorimetry data, runaway analysis, HAZOP and layers of protection, so hazards are designed out before construction rather than managed around afterwards.

Process Safety Scope

The studies and calculations that turn a chemical process into a plant that can be operated safely.

Process
Safety
Reaction calorimetry & thermal screening
01
Adiabatic temperature rise & MTSR
02
Runaway reaction analysis
03
Relief system sizing (DIERS methods)
04
Stability & incompatibility screening
05
Flammability & static electricity hazards
06
07
HAZID & HAZOP studies
08
LOPA & SIL review
09
Inerting & oxygen control
10
Hazardous area classification
11
Emergency cooling & quench design
12
Pre-startup review & change management
Study Mapping

Process Safety & HAZOP Studies

The assessments and studies we carry out, what each produces, and the data it rests on.

Service Area
What We Deliver
Where It Applies
Engineering Detail

Reaction calorimetry

Hazard data
Heat-release profile
Heat of reaction
Accumulation data
Exothermic batch and semi-batch reactions.
⚙️

Scope & Configuration

Measured heat flow of the reaction under process conditions.

Design Basis

The process recipe, dosing profile and reaction conditions.

📐

Method & Approach

Run the process in a reaction calorimeter to measure heat release, accumulation and cooling demand, and use the data to set dosing rates and check cooling capacity.

Risk & Quality Controls

Dosing is designed so unreacted material cannot accumulate beyond what cooling can handle.

Thermal stability screening (DSC and ARC)

Hazard data
Onset temperatures
Decomposition energy
Reaction masses, intermediates and products.
⚙️

Scope & Configuration

Thermal screening of materials for decomposition and self-heating.

Design Basis

Sample composition and the temperatures the process can reach.

📐

Method & Approach

Screen by differential scanning calorimetry, follow with adiabatic calorimetry where screening shows decomposition energy, and set safe operating limits below the onset.

Risk & Quality Controls

Limits include a margin below onset and account for hold-up and heating failures.

Runaway and MTSR assessment

Hazard data
Adiabatic temperature rise
MTSR
Criticality classification
Exothermic processes at plant scale.
⚙️

Scope & Configuration

What happens if cooling is lost during the reaction.

Design Basis

Accumulated heat, specific heat of the mixture and its boiling point.

📐

Method & Approach

Calculate the adiabatic temperature rise and the maximum temperature of the synthesis reaction, compare them with the decomposition onset and boiling point, and classify the process by criticality.

Risk & Quality Controls

The result decides how much protection is needed, from procedural to engineered.

HAZOP study

Hazard reviews
HAZOP report
Action register
New and modified processes and plants.
⚙️

Scope & Configuration

A structured review of each line and vessel against deviations from design intent.

Design Basis

Current P&IDs, process description and operating procedures.

📐

Method & Approach

Facilitate a team review node by node using guide words, record causes, consequences and safeguards, and assign actions.

Risk & Quality Controls

Actions are tracked to closure before start-up.

HAZID and what-if reviews

Hazard reviews
Hazard register
Early design recommendations
Concept and early design stages.
⚙️

Scope & Configuration

Early identification of major hazards, when changes are cheapest.

Design Basis

Process description, materials and the site layout concept.

📐

Method & Approach

Run a structured brainstorm on materials, operations and site, and feed the findings into the design basis.

Risk & Quality Controls

Hazards are addressed by inherently safer choices before protection is added.

LOPA and SIL review

Protective design
Risk reduction requirements
Safeguard independence check
Scenarios with severe consequences.
⚙️

Scope & Configuration

Whether the existing safeguards are enough for each high-consequence scenario.

Design Basis

Scenario frequency and consequence data, and safeguard performance.

📐

Method & Approach

Take scenarios from the HAZOP, assign initiating-event frequencies and credit only independent layers, then determine any further risk reduction and specify instrumented functions.

Risk & Quality Controls

Only independent, specific and auditable safeguards are credited.

Relief and venting design

Protective design
Relief scenario definition
Device sizing
Discharge handling
Reactors and vessels that can over-pressure.
⚙️

Scope & Configuration

Protection against over-pressure, including runaway reactions.

Design Basis

The worst credible scenario, venting data and vessel design pressure.

📐

Method & Approach

Define relief scenarios, size devices with established methods (including two-phase flow for runaway reactions), and design a safe discharge to a catch tank or treatment.

Risk & Quality Controls

Discharge is routed to a safe location and its consequences are assessed.

Hazardous area and explosion protection

Protective design
Area classification drawings
Equipment selection basis
Plants handling flammable liquids, gases or combustible dust.
⚙️

Scope & Configuration

Where flammable atmospheres can occur, and what equipment may be used there.

Design Basis

Properties of the materials, release sources and ventilation.

📐

Method & Approach

Identify release sources, classify zones, and select equipment, earthing and inerting to suit.

Risk & Quality Controls

Static electricity and other ignition sources are managed alongside classification.

Pre-startup review and change management

Operations
Pre-startup safety review checklist
Management-of-change procedure
Start-up, modifications and handover.
⚙️

Scope & Configuration

Check that the plant matches the design and that hazards are controlled, before start-up and after any change.

Design Basis

As-built drawings, procedures and training records.

📐

Method & Approach

Verify construction against the design, confirm that actions are closed, and apply change control to later modifications.

Risk & Quality Controls

Start-up is not authorised until safety-critical items are verified.

How a process safety assessment runs

Process Safety

From Hazard Data to a Safe Plant

Each step turns a hazard into a decision: change the chemistry, the process, the equipment or the protection.

Scroll to follow the workflow
Stainless steel vessels and blue pipework on multi-level platforms in a process plant
01 Screening

Hazard Screening

Review the chemistry, materials and conditions to identify which reactions and substances need measured data before design continues.

Speak With Our Engineers
Jacketed stainless steel batch reactor with a relief line and catch tank in a reactor bay
02 Data

Calorimetry & Thermal Data

Measure heat release, accumulation and decomposition behaviour under process conditions, so decisions rest on data, not estimates.

Speak With Our Engineers
Skid-mounted pump and valve station with stainless steel pipework in an industrial hall
03 Analysis

Scenario Analysis

Work out what happens on loss of cooling, wrong charge, or loss of agitation, and how severe each credible scenario could be.

Speak With Our Engineers
Stainless steel vessels and blue pipework on multi-level platforms in a process plant
04 Review

HAZOP & LOPA

Review the design systematically with a team, then test whether independent safeguards are enough for the severe scenarios.

Speak With Our Engineers
Chemical plant construction site with structural steel, pipe racks and a mobile crane
05 Protection

Protective Design

Specify relief and venting, inerting, interlocks and emergency cooling, and route discharges to a safe location.

Speak With Our Engineers
Jacketed stainless steel batch reactor with a relief line and catch tank in a reactor bay
06 Verification

Verification & Handover

Verify construction against the design, close the action register and complete the pre-startup review before the first charge.

Speak With Our Engineers
Let's Collaborate

Planning a new process or a scale-up?

Tell us about the chemistry and the scale and we will outline the thermal data and safety studies needed before design is fixed.

Discuss a Safety Assessment
Knowledge Base

Process Safety Knowledge Base

Thermal safety, calorimetry and reactor design guides from our technical team.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Straight answers to the questions we hear most often.

What is a HAZOP study?

A HAZOP (hazard and operability) study is a structured team review of a process design. Each line and vessel is examined against deviations such as no flow, more pressure or wrong composition, and the team records the causes, consequences, existing safeguards and any actions needed.

When is reaction calorimetry needed?

Whenever a reaction releases significant heat, especially if reagents are added over time or material could accumulate. Calorimetry measures the heat release under process conditions, which sets safe dosing rates and shows whether plant cooling can cope.

What is MTSR?

MTSR is the maximum temperature of the synthesis reaction: the temperature the mixture would reach if cooling failed while the maximum amount of unreacted material was present. It is compared with the boiling point and the decomposition onset of the reaction mass to judge how severe a cooling failure could be.

What is the difference between HAZOP and LOPA?

HAZOP identifies scenarios and lists safeguards. LOPA (layer of protection analysis) then takes the higher-consequence scenarios and checks, with simple frequency calculations, whether the independent safeguards in place reduce the risk enough or whether another layer is needed.

Why is relief sizing difficult for runaway reactions?

During a runaway the vented flow can be two-phase, a mixture of vapour and liquid, which usually needs larger relief areas than single-phase vapour. Sizing requires vent-sizing test data or established two-phase methods such as the DIERS approach, not rules of thumb.

Should process safety be reviewed when scaling up?

Yes. Heat removal per unit volume falls as vessels get larger, so a reaction that is easy to control in the laboratory can exceed cooling capacity at scale. Safety reviews at each scale-up stage catch this before construction.

Contact Details

Reach us directly.

Prefer a direct line? Reach our formulation team through any channel below — we typically respond within one business day.

Message on WhatsApp